Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Its helpful if you can give some pointers on what parameters (like > latency, throughput etc) you want us to consider for QoS. Full blown QoS would be nice, but a first line of defense against resource hogs seems just badly required. A bare minimum could be to process client's FOP in a round robin fashion. That way even if one client sends a lot of FOPs, there is always some window for others to slip in. Any opinion? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel