On Wednesday 29 July 2015 Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2015 03:40 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >> hi, >> I just updated >> https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures with the latest >> spurious failures we saw in linux and NetBSD regressions. Could you guys >> update with any more spurious regressions that you guys are observing >> but not listed on the pad. Could you guys help in fixing these issues >> fast as the number of failures is increasing quite a bit nowadays. >> > > I think we have been very tolerant for failing tests and it is time to > change this behavior. I propose that: > > - we block commits for components that have failing tests listed in the > tracking etherpad. > > > - once failing tests are addressed on a particular branch, normal patch > merging can resume. > > - If there are tests that cannot be fixed easily in the near term, we > move such tests to a different folder or drop such test units. We still have a couple tests with frequent, spurious failures. Let's please either get these fixed, or removed from the tree if they are fundamentally broken. Otherwise we'll have to invoke the nuclear option. ;-) -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
