On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 07:51:23AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Yep, i keep bumping into them. At first, i was hopeful it would be 1 or > 2, due to newer Fedora, but in fact, the doc was missing a few required > packages, so I disabled the host, and I will do the test by hand until > it reasonably work manually before putting it back in the pool. But it seems the failure acts as a barrierfor the other regression tests. How do I move it forward? http://review.gluster.org/11735 http://review.gluster.org/11763 Or perhaps someone could just merge? The change set have changed very little since last time it managed to pass through regression spurious failures, and ir got CR +2 at that time. At least it passed NetBSD regression in its latest version. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
