Since we have some common interest in proposed design, IMHO let's start doing the implementation by keeping all of this valuable suggestions in mind. If any one interested to volunteer this project, please reply to this thread. Regards Rafi KC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shyam" <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx>, gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 11:23:34 PM Subject: Re: Automated bug workflow On 05/29/2015 12:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi all, > > today we had a discussion about how to get the status of reported bugs > more correct and up to date. It is something that has come up several > times already, but now we have a "BIG solution" as Pranith calls it. > > The goal is rather simple, but is requires some thinking about rules and > components that can actually take care of the automation. > > The general user-visible results would be: > > * rfc.sh will ask if this patch it the last one for the bug, or if more > patches are expected > * Gerrit will receive the patch with the answer, and modify the status > of the bug to POST I like to do this manually. > * when the patch is merged, Gerrit will change (or not) the status of > the bug to MODIFIED I like to do this manually too... but automation does not hurt, esp. when I control when the bug moves to POST. > * when a nightly build is made, all bugs that have patches included and > the status of the bug is MODIFIED, the build script will change the > status to ON_QA and set a "fixed in version" This I would like automated, as I am not tracking when it was released (of sorts). But, if I miss the nightly boat, I assume the automation would not pick this up, as a result automation on the MODIFIED step is good, as that would take care of this miss for me. > > This is a simplified view, there are some other cases that we need to > take care of. These are documented in the etherpad linked below. > > We value any input for this, Kaleb and Rafi already gave some, thanks! > Please let us know over email or IRC and we'll update the etherpad. Overall, we can have all of this, but I guess I will possibly never use the POST automation and do that myself. > > Thanks, > Pranith & Niels > > > Etherpad with detailed step by step actions to take: > > https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-automated-bug-workflow > > IRC log, where the discussion started: > > https://botbot.me/freenode/gluster-dev/2015-05-29/?msg=40450336&page=2 > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
