Re: Huge memory consumption with quota-marker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 01 July 2015 08:41 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
Hi,

The new marker xlator uses syncop framework to update quota-size in the
background, it uses one synctask per write FOP.
If there are 100 parallel writes with all different inodes but on the
same directory '/dir', there will be ~100 txn waiting in queue to
acquire a lock on on its parent i.e '/dir'.
Each of this txn uses a syntack and each synctask allocates stack size
of 2M (default size), so total 0f 200M usage. This usage can increase
depending on the load.

I am think of of using the stacksize for synctask to 256k, will this mem
be sufficient as we perform very limited operations within a synctask in
marker updation?


Seems like a good idea to me. Do we need a 256k stacksize or can we live with something even smaller?

Thanks,
Vijay

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux