Re: Rebalance is not working in single node cluster environment.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sent from Samsung Galaxy S4
On 13 Jun 2015 13:15, "Raghavendra Talur" <raghavendra.talur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherjee83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Sent from Samsung Galaxy S4
>> On 13 Jun 2015 12:58, "Anand Nekkunti" <anekkunt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All
>> >    Rebalance is not working in single node cluster environment ( current test frame work ).  I am getting error in below test , it seems re-balance is not migrated to  current cluster test framework.
>> Could you pin point which test case fails and what log do you see?
>> >
>> > cleanup;
>> > TEST launch_cluster 2;
>> > TEST $CLI_1 peer probe $H2;
>> >
>> > EXPECT_WITHIN $PROBE_TIMEOUT 1 check_peers
>> >
>> > $CLI_1 volume create $V0 $H1:$B1/$V0  $H2:$B2/$V0
>> > EXPECT 'Created' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
>> >
>> > $CLI_1 volume start $V0
>> > EXPECT 'Started' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
>> >
>> > #Mount FUSE
>> > TEST glusterfs -s $H1 --volfile-id=$V0 $M0;
>> >
>> > TEST mkdir $M0/dir{1..4};
>> > TEST touch $M0/dir{1..4}/files{1..4};
>> >
>> > TEST $CLI_1 volume add-brick $V0 $H1:$B1/${V0}1 $H2:$B2/${V0}1
>> >
>> > TEST $CLI_1 volume rebalance $V0  start
>> >
>> > EXPECT_WITHIN 60 "completed" CLI_1_rebalance_status_field $V0
>> >
>> > $CLI_2 volume status $V0
>> > EXPECT 'Started' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
>> >
>> > cleanup;
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Anand.N
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
>> > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
> If it is a crash of glusterd when you do rebalance start, it is because of FORTIFY_FAIL in libc.
> Here is the patch that Susant has already sent: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11090/
>
> You can verify that it is the same crash by checking the core in gdb; a SIGABRT would be raised
> after strncpy.
>
AFAIR Anand tried it in mainline and that fix was already in place.  I think this is something different.
> --
> Raghavendra Talur 
>

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux