Re: Patch needs merging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hi,
> 
> Can you please merge the following patches:
> 
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11087/

Avra,

I think you should maintain the snapshot scheduler feature
and shouldn't depend on me as a glusterd maintainer, for
merging changes. I am not really maintaining snapshot scheduler
in any sense of the word, so I should not be merging patches too :)

Vijay,
Is it too late to add Avra to the list of proposed maintainers? Avra
has also worked extensively in glusterd for geo-replication, volume-snapshot
and volume-locks (core), mgmt-v3 transaction framework (core) etc. He is the 
only one sending patches to snapshot-scheduler feature. I have been merging patches
since it is built on top of volume-snapshot, which I think I shouldn't be.
Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux