Sent a patch to fix the failure http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11125/ I will back-port the patch once it gets merged in the master branch. Thanks, Sachin. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sachin Pandit" <spandit@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 5:27:41 PM > Subject: Re: release-3.7 regression tests stability > > comments inline. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sachin Pandit" <spandit@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 11:40:05 AM > > Subject: Re: release-3.7 regression tests stability > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" > > > <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: "Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna" <vmallika@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Sachin Pandit" > > > <spandit@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 10:25:24 AM > > > Subject: Re: release-3.7 regression tests stability > > > > > > > > > > > > On 06/05/2015 11:38 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > > On 06/05/2015 09:39 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > >> I still see lot of patches in release-3.7 are failing regression, be > > > >> it > > > >> Linux or Netbsd. Does this mean all the spurious fixes which we did in > > > >> mainline are yet to be in 3.7? If so, what are we waiting for? > > > > > > > > Most of the fixes are in release-3.7. Apart from glupy.t, are we aware > > > > of others that fail in release-3.7 consistently but pass the mainline > > > > regression runs? > > > I see inode-quota.t failed in these following two runs: > > > > > > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/10189/consoleFull > > > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/10210/consoleFull > > > > > > Ccing Vijai & Sachin > > > > I did some analysis on this and found out below mentioned > log during the case of failure. > > [2015-06-08 03:45:21.317352] I [MSGID: 115071] > [server-rpc-fops.c:1591:server_crea > te_cbk] 0-patchy-server: 203: CREATE /test_dir/test1.txt > (72fa9c7d-d4cd-474e-baae- > 28dde9b15990/test1.txt) ==> (Disk quota exceeded) [Disk quota exceeded] > > The test case which fails is "TEST_IN_LOOP touch $M0/test_dir/test$i.txt", > while creating a file "test1" (i.e i=1). This should not fail as "test1" is > the first file being created in the directory where quota limit is set. > The only possible explanation is that before creating the file "test1", > we delete all the files present in that directory, and that information > has not been updated by marker. Because of which the new file creation > fails thinking the quota limit is still exceeded. > > The test case basically validates both the types of quota (size and inode). > The reason for this spurious failure might be because of the delay in > updating the information my marker. I will verify the same by inducing > some delay before the execution of above mentioned testcase. > > Thanks, > Sachin. > > > > Thank you Atin for reporting this failure. > > We will have a look at the failure and update > > this thread as and when we make any progress. > > > > Thanks, > > Sachin Pandit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suspect that we also might be hitting some new failures due to the > > > > previously failing tests now passing. > > > > > > > > -Vijay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ~Atin > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
