> Seems like we are already inside pool->lock while doing statedump which > does writes to files, so may be I shouldn't think too much :-/. I will > take a look at your patch once. Ah, now it makes sense. I thought you knew about pool->lock already. I was wondering why you were even trying to avoid locks when these data structures are designed to use explict mutexes to synchronize across threads that access them concurrently. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
