Re: NetBSD regression status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 06/03/2015 07:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:30:31PM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi

Here is NetBSD regression status for master and release-3.7:

The following tests always fail:
./tests/basic/ec/ec.t
./tests/basic/ec/quota.t
./tests/basic/ec/self-heal.t
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t

Uncharted terriotiry:
./tests/bugs

Fails, but never passed:
./tests/geo-rep


Additionnaly, ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t passes but:
Running tests in file ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t
[10:03:02] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 25/35 umount: unknown option -- l
Usage: umount [-fvFR] [-t fstypelist] special | node
          umount -a[fvF] [-h host] [-t fstypelist]

It is a bit nasty to use a Linux-only option where portability was
the goal:
# Check promotion on read to slow tier
( cd $M0 ; umount -l $M0 ) # fail but drops kernel cache
I'm also not sure if this really drops the caches on Linux. Someone
tested it (Ravi?) and did not see the same cache reduction as when using
"echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches".

Yes, my review comment in http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10253/5/tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t describes what I observed.
-Ravi
We probably need to introduce a function for this that handles both the
NetBSD and Linux methods.

Niels

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux