----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 9:43:56 AM > Subject: Re: NetBSD regression status > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:30:31PM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > > Hi > > > > Here is NetBSD regression status for master and release-3.7: > > > > The following tests always fail: > > ./tests/basic/ec/ec.t > > ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t > > ./tests/basic/ec/self-heal.t > > ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t > > > > Uncharted terriotiry: > > ./tests/bugs > > > > Fails, but never passed: > > ./tests/geo-rep > > > > > > Additionnaly, ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t passes but: > > Running tests in file ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t > > [10:03:02] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 25/35 umount: unknown option -- l > > Usage: umount [-fvFR] [-t fstypelist] special | node > > umount -a[fvF] [-h host] [-t fstypelist] > > > > It is a bit nasty to use a Linux-only option where portability was > > the goal: > > # Check promotion on read to slow tier > > ( cd $M0 ; umount -l $M0 ) # fail but drops kernel cache > > I'm also not sure if this really drops the caches on Linux. Someone > tested it (Ravi?) and did not see the same cache reduction as when using > "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches". > > We probably need to introduce a function for this that handles both the > NetBSD and Linux methods. There was a suggestion to do this, see comments for fix 10411. There are some subtle differences: ( cd $M0 ; umount -l $M0 ) - drops only the fs. - does not drop FUSE's cache. Whereas, /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches drops everything on the system. > > Niels > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
