Re: Logjam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:51:34AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> I don't mean to be snarky here, but it seems like you've spent more
> time studying OpenSSL usage across multiple versions and projects than
> it would have taken to write a patch.  Is that an indictment of our
> overly burdensome patch-submission process, or something else?  What
> can we do to improve this?

While there: indeed it can be improved.

Reliable regression tests will make it much less hostile. Faster tests
would be nice too. We can acehive this by running parts of the test 
suite in paralell and requesting a verified score high enough.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux