Re: Adding basic/ec/ec.t to is_bad_test due to spurious failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> Pranith/Xavi,
> 
> ./tests/basic/ec/ec.t is part of
> https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
> but is not part of is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh. This has repeatedly
> failed an other independent spurious regression failure fix,
> http://review.gluster.com/10872
> (for bugs/glusterd/bug-974007.t). Please merge
> http://review.gluster.org/10907 to
> unblock other regression test failure fixes.

Here is the link to the regression run which failed in basic/ec.t.
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB/1167/consoleFull
Hope that helps in analysis.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux