Re: New NetBSD regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/05/15 23:59, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
I ran NetBSD regressions on master and I get many new failures. For
whoever is interested:

./tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t
   Failed test:  25
./tests/basic/geo-replication/marker-xattrs.t
   Failed test:  32
./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
   Failed test:  45

Is it spurious or fails in every run?
Regards,
Jiffin
./tests/basic/tier/bug-1214222-directories_miising_after_attach_tier.t
   Failed tests:  16-17
./tests/basic/tier/tier.t
   Failed tests:  25-26, 33
./tests/bitrot/br-stub.t
   => hang

This one already known for being a failure:
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
   Failed tests:  22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36



_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux