Re: good job on fixing heavy hitters in spurious regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 05/08/2015 11:37 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:

On 05/08/2015 04:45 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:


On 05/08/2015 08:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Do you guys have any ideas in keeping the regression failures under control?

I sent a patch to append the commands being run in the .t files to gluster logs @ http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10667/ While it certainly doesn't help check regression failures, I think it makes log analysis a bit easier. Comments welcome. :-)
Neat :-). Do you think we can also add .t before the test?


Thanks! Yup, resubmitted the patch. :)
For some reason data-self-heal.t is always failing with the modification. I'll check why.
-Ravi


From:
[2015-05-08 11:02:43.062108594]:++++++++++ TEST: 47 abc cat /mnt/glusterfs/0/b ++++++++++
To:
[2015-05-08 11:02:43.062108594]:++++++++++ <test-name>.t:TEST: 47 abc cat /mnt/glusterfs/0/b ++++++++++

Pranith

-Ravi

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux