Re: NetBSD regression status upate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> - tests/basic/ec/
> This worked but with rare spurious faiures. They are the same as on
> Linux and work have been done, hence I think I should probably enable
> again, but it may have rotten a lot. I have to give it a try

It is rather grim. NetBSD ec tests went from rare spurious failures a
few weeks ago to complete reproductible failure (see below). Anyone
interested looking at it? A lot of errors ae preceded by Input/Output
error messages that suggest a common root.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
./tests/basic/ec/ec-3-1.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 217 Failed: 4)
  Failed tests:  133-134, 138-139
./tests/basic/ec/ec-4-1.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 253 Failed: 6)
  Failed tests:  152-153, 157-158, 162-163
./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 289 Failed: 8)
  Failed tests:  171-172, 176-177, 181-182, 186-187
./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t        (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  9
./tests/basic/ec/quota.t             (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  24
./tests/basic/ec/self-heal.t         (Wstat: 0 Tests: 257 Failed: 5)
  Failed tests:  184, 195, 206, 217, 228
Files=15, Tests=2711, 3306 wallclock secs 


-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux