----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafi Kavungal > Chundattu Parambil" <rkavunga@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Aravinda" <avishwan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Sachin Pandit" <spandit@xxxxxxxxxx>, > "Raghavendra Bhat" <rabhat@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 10:53:01 PM > Subject: Re: spurious regression status > > On 05/06/2015 06:52 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi, > > Please backport the patches that fix spurious regressions to 3.7 > > as well. This is the status of regressions now: > > > > * ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1035576.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 2) > > > > * Failed tests: 20-21 > > > > * > > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8329/consoleFull > > > > > > * ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1112559.t: 1 new core files > > > > * > > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8308/consoleFull > > > > * One more occurrence - > > > > * Failed tests: 9, 11 > > > > * > > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8430/consoleFull > > > Rafi - this seems to be a test unit contributed by you. Can you please > look into this one? > > > > * ./tests/geo-rep/georep-rsync-changelog.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 3 Failed: > > 0) > > > > * Non-zero exit status: 1 > > > > * > > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8168/console > > > > > > Aravinda/Kotresh - any update on this? If we do not intend enabling > geo-replication tests in regression runs for now, this should go off the > list. > > > > > * ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t (failed-test: 21) > > > > * Happens in: master > > (http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8147/consoleFull) > > <http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8147/consoleFull%29> > > > > * Being investigated by: ? > > > > Sachin - does this happen anymore or should we move it off the list? quota-anon-fd.t failure is consistent in NetBSD, whereas in linux apart from test failure mentioned in etherpad I did not see this failure again in the regression runs. However, I remember Pranith talking about hitting this issue again. > > > > > > > * tests/features/glupy.t > > > > * nuked tests 7153, 7167, 7169, 7173, 7212 > > > > Emmanuel's investigation should help us here. Thanks! > > > > > * tests/basic/volume-snapshot-clone.t > > > > * http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10053/ > > > > * Came back on April 9 > > > > * http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/6658/ > > > > Rafi - does this happen anymore? If fixed due to subsequent commits, we > should look at dropping this test from is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh. > > > > > * tests/basic/uss.t > > > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209286 > > > > * http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10143/ > > > > * Came back on April 9 > > > > * http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/6660/ > > > > * ./tests/bugs/glusterfs/bug-867253.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1) > > > > * Failed test: 8 > > > > Raghu - does this happen anymore? If fixed due to subsequent commits, we > should look at dropping this test from is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh. > > -Vijay > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
