Re: spurious regression status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafi Kavungal
> Chundattu Parambil" <rkavunga@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Aravinda" <avishwan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Sachin Pandit" <spandit@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Raghavendra Bhat" <rabhat@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 10:53:01 PM
> Subject: Re:  spurious regression status
> 
> On 05/06/2015 06:52 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > hi,
> >        Please backport the patches that fix spurious regressions to 3.7
> > as well. This is the status of regressions now:
> >
> >   * ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1035576.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 2)
> >
> >   * Failed tests:  20-21
> >
> >   *
> >   http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8329/consoleFull
> >
> >
> >   * ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1112559.t: 1 new core files
> >
> >   *
> >   http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8308/consoleFull
> >
> >   * One more occurrence -
> >
> >   * Failed tests:  9, 11
> >
> >   *
> >   http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8430/consoleFull
> 
> 
> Rafi - this seems to be a test unit contributed by you. Can you please
> look into this one?
> 
> 
> >   * ./tests/geo-rep/georep-rsync-changelog.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 3 Failed:
> >   0)
> >
> >   * Non-zero exit status: 1
> >
> >   *
> >   http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8168/console
> >
> >
> 
> Aravinda/Kotresh - any update on this? If we do not intend enabling
> geo-replication tests in regression runs for now, this should go off the
> list.
> 
> >
> >   * ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t (failed-test: 21)
> >
> >   * Happens in: master
> >     (http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8147/consoleFull)
> >     <http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8147/consoleFull%29>
> >
> >   * Being investigated by: ?
> >
> 
> Sachin - does this happen anymore or should we move it off the list?

quota-anon-fd.t failure is consistent in NetBSD, whereas in linux
apart from test failure mentioned in etherpad I did not see this
failure again in the regression runs. However, I remember Pranith
talking about hitting this issue again. 

> 
> >
> >
> >   * tests/features/glupy.t
> >
> >   * nuked tests 7153, 7167, 7169, 7173, 7212
> >
> 
> Emmanuel's investigation should help us here. Thanks!
> 
> >
> >   * tests/basic/volume-snapshot-clone.t
> >
> >   * http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10053/
> >
> >   * Came back on April 9
> >
> >   * http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/6658/
> >
> 
> Rafi - does this happen anymore? If fixed due to subsequent commits, we
> should look at dropping this test from is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh.
> 
> >
> >   * tests/basic/uss.t
> >
> >   * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209286
> >
> >   * http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10143/
> >
> >   * Came back on April 9
> >
> >   * http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/6660/
> >
> >   * ./tests/bugs/glusterfs/bug-867253.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1)
> >
> >   * Failed test:  8
> >
> 
> Raghu - does this happen anymore? If fixed due to subsequent commits, we
> should look at dropping this test from is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh.
> 
> -Vijay
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux