Re: spurious regression status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/07/2015 01:24 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>>>   * tests/basic/volume-snapshot-clone.t
>>>
>>>   * http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10053/
>>>
>>>   * Came back on April 9
>>>
>>>   * http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/6658/
>>>
>>
>> Rafi - does this happen anymore? If fixed due to subsequent commits, we
>> should look at dropping this test from is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh.
> 
> I'm still seeing this one quite a lot in logs, though the errors are
> being ignored.
Yesterday I started looking into it. I will update once I progress on
the analysis.

~Atin
> 
>>>   * tests/basic/uss.t
>>>
>>>   * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209286
>>>
>>>   * http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10143/
>>>
>>>   * Came back on April 9
>>>
>>>   * http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/6660/
>>>
>>>   * ./tests/bugs/glusterfs/bug-867253.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1)
>>>
>>>   * Failed test:  8
>>>
>>
>> Raghu - does this happen anymore? If fixed due to subsequent commits, we
>> should look at dropping this test from is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh.
> 
> Same for this one.  If we re-enabled result checking for these two, maybe
> half of our test runs would start failing again.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 

-- 
~Atin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux