Re: ec spurious regression failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/05/2015 01:35 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 05/05/2015 11:40 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I sent http://review.gluster.org/10540 to address it completely. Not
sure if it works on netBSD. Emmanuel help!!

I launched test runs in a loop on nbslave70. More later.

Failed on first pass:
Test Summary Report
-------------------
./tests/basic/ec/ec-3-1.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 217 Failed: 4)
   Failed tests:  133-134, 138-139
./tests/basic/ec/ec-4-1.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 253 Failed: 6)
   Failed tests:  152-153, 157-158, 162-163
./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 289 Failed: 8)
   Failed tests:  171-172, 176-177, 181-182, 186-187
./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t        (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1)
   Failed test:  9
./tests/basic/ec/quota.t             (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 1)
   Failed test:  24




In addition ec-12-4.t has started failing again [1]. Have added a note about this to the etherpad.
Already updated the status about this in the earlier mail. http://review.gluster.org/10539 is the fix.

-Vijay

[1] http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8312/consoleFull

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux