On 05/02/2015 08:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
As per the etherpad:
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
* tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 64 Failed: 35)
* Failed tests: 1-6, 11, 20-30, 33-34, 36, 41, 50-61, 64
* Happens in master (Mon 30th March - git commit id
3feaf1648528ff39e23748ac9004a77595460c9d)
* (hasn't yet been added to BZs)
If glusterd itself fails to come up, of course the test will fail :-).
Is it still happening?
We have not been actively curating this list for the last few days and
am not certain if this failure happens anymore.
Investigating why a regression run fails for our patches and fixing them
(though unrelated to our patch) should be the most effective way going
ahead.
-Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
