On 04/29/2015 08:57 AM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
Doh my mistake, I thought it was merged. I was just running with the upstream 3.7 daily. Can I use this run as my baseline and then I can run next time on the patch to show the % improvement? I'll wipe everything and try on the patch, any idea when it will be merged?
Patch should be merged today (master). It has passed regression and the one compile error is also cleared up. Doing last mile checks before merge.
-b On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Susant Palai <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Hi Ben I checked out the glusterfs process attaching gdb and I could not find the newer code. Can you confirm whether you took the new patch ? patch i: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9657/ Thanks, Susant ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>> > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>>, "Nithya Balachandran" <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx>> > Cc: "Shyamsundar Ranganathan" <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:22:02 PM > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > This is how it looks for 2000 file. each 1MB. Done rebalance on 2*2 + 2. > > OLDER: > [root@gprfs030 ~]# gluster v rebalance test1 status > Node Rebalanced-files size > scanned failures > skipped status run > time in secs > --------- ----------- ----------- > ----------- ----------- ----------- > ------------ -------------- > localhost 2000 1.9GB > 3325 0 0 > completed 63.00 > gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes > 2158 0 0 > completed 6.00 > volume rebalance: test1: success: > [root@gprfs030 ~]# > > > NEW: > [root@gprfs030 upstream_rebalance]# gluster v rebalance test1 status > Node Rebalanced-files size > scanned failures > skipped status run > time in secs > --------- ----------- ----------- > ----------- ----------- ----------- > ------------ -------------- > localhost 2000 1.9GB > 2011 0 0 > completed 12.00 > gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes > 0 0 0 > failed 0.00 [Failed > because of a crash which I will address in next > patch] > volume rebalance: test1: success: > > > Just trying out replica behaviour for rebalance. > > Here is the volume info. > [root@gprfs030 ~]# gluster v i > > Volume Name: test1 > Type: Distributed-Replicate > Volume ID: e12ef289-86f2-454a-beaa-72ea763dbada > Status: Started > Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: gprfs030-10ge:/bricks/gprfs030/brick1 > Brick2: gprfs032-10ge:/bricks/gprfs032/brick1 > Brick3: gprfs030-10ge:/bricks/gprfs030/brick2 > Brick4: gprfs032-10ge:/bricks/gprfs032/brick2 > Brick5: gprfs030-10ge:/bricks/gprfs030/brick3 > Brick6: gprfs032-10ge:/bricks/gprfs032/brick3 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>> > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:13:04 PM > > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > > > Ben, will you be able to give rebal stat for the same configuration and > > data > > set with older rebalance infra ? > > > > Thanks, > > Susant > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>> > > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:08:38 PM > > > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > Yes we were using pure dist volume. Will check in to your systems for > > > more > > > info. > > > > > > Can you please update which patch set you used ? In the mean time I will > > > do > > > one set of test with the same configuration on a small data set. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Susant > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>> > > > > To: "Nithya Balachandran" <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > Cc: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>>, "Gluster Devel" > > > > <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:13:05 AM > > > > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > I am not seeing the performance you were. I am running on 500GB of > > > > data: > > > > > > > > [root@gqas001 ~]# gluster v rebalance testvol status > > > > Node Rebalanced-files > > > > size scanned failures skipped status > > > > run > > > > time in secs > > > > --------- ----------- > > > > ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > > > > ------------ > > > > -------------- > > > > localhost 129021 > > > > 7.9GB 912104 0 0 in progress > > > > 10100.00 > > > > gqas012.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com <http://gqas012.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com> 0 0Bytes > > > > 1930312 0 0 in progress > > > > 10100.00 > > > > gqas003.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com <http://gqas003.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com> 0 0Bytes > > > > 1930312 0 0 in progress > > > > 10100.00 > > > > gqas004.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com <http://gqas004.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com> 128903 7.9GB > > > > 946730 0 0 in progress > > > > 10100.00 > > > > gqas013.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com <http://gqas013.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com> 0 0Bytes > > > > 1930312 0 0 in progress > > > > 10100.00 > > > > gqas014.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com <http://gqas014.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com> 0 0Bytes > > > > 1930312 0 0 in progress > > > > 10100.00 > > > > > > > > Based on what I am seeing I expect this to take 2 days. Was you rebal > > > > run > > > > on a pure dist volume? I am trying on 2x2 + 2 new bricks. Any idea > > > > why > > > > mine is taking so long? > > > > > > > > -b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Nithya Balachandran > > > > <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > That sounds great. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Nithya > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > To: "Nithya Balachandran" <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > Cc: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>>, "Gluster Devel" < > > > > > gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 April, 2015 12:14:14 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > I am setting up a test env now, I'll have some feedback for you this > > > > > week. > > > > > > > > > > -b > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Nithya Balachandran > > > > > <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to try this out? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Nithya > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 9:55:07 AM > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > Uploaded a new patch here: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9657/. > > > > > > We > > > > > > can > > > > > > start perf test on it. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Susant > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 3:40:09 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ben. RPM is not available and I am planning to refresh the > > > > > > patch > > > > > in > > > > > > two days with some more regression fixes. I think we can run the > > > > > > tests > > > > > post > > > > > > that. Any larger data-set will be good(say 3 to 5 TB). > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Susant > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > To: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > Cc: "Susant Palai" <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spalai@xxxxxxxxxx>>, "Gluster Devel" < > > > > > > gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 2:10:30 AM > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have some rebalance perf regression stuff I have been working on, > > > > > > is > > > > > > there an RPM with these patches anywhere so that I can try it on my > > > > > > systems? If not I'll just build from: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > git fetch git:// review.gluster.org/glusterfs <http://review.gluster.org/glusterfs> > > > > > > refs/changes/57/9657/8 > > > > > > && > > > > > > git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will have _at_least_ 10TB of storage, how many TBs of data should > > > > > > I > > > > > > run > > > > > > with? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Vijay Bellur < vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/07/2015 03:08 PM, Susant Palai wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is one test performed on a 300GB data set and around 100%(1/2 > > > > > > the > > > > > > time) improvement was seen. > > > > > > > > > > > > [root@gprfs031 ~]# gluster v i > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume Name: rbperf > > > > > > Type: Distribute > > > > > > Volume ID: 35562662-337e-4923-b862- d0bbb0748003 > > > > > > Status: Started > > > > > > Number of Bricks: 4 > > > > > > Transport-type: tcp > > > > > > Bricks: > > > > > > Brick1: gprfs029-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs029/brick1 > > > > > > Brick2: gprfs030-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs030/brick1 > > > > > > Brick3: gprfs031-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs031/brick1 > > > > > > Brick4: gprfs032-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs032/brick1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Added server 32 and started rebalance force. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rebalance stat for new changes: > > > > > > [root@gprfs031 ~]# gluster v rebalance rbperf status > > > > > > Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time > > > > > > in > > > > > secs > > > > > > --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > > > > > > ----------- > > > > > > ------------ -------------- > > > > > > localhost 74639 36.1GB 297319 0 0 completed 1743.00 > > > > > > 172.17.40.30 67512 33.5GB 269187 0 0 completed 1395.00 > > > > > > gprfs029-10ge 79095 38.8GB 284105 0 0 completed 1559.00 > > > > > > gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 completed 402.00 > > > > > > volume rebalance: rbperf: success: > > > > > > > > > > > > Rebalance stat for old model: > > > > > > [root@gprfs031 ~]# gluster v rebalance rbperf status > > > > > > Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time > > > > > > in > > > > > secs > > > > > > --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > > > > > > ----------- > > > > > > ------------ -------------- > > > > > > localhost 86493 42.0GB 634302 0 0 completed 3329.00 > > > > > > gprfs029-10ge 94115 46.2GB 687852 0 0 completed 3328.00 > > > > > > gprfs030-10ge 74314 35.9GB 651943 0 0 completed 3072.00 > > > > > > gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes 594166 0 0 completed 1943.00 > > > > > > volume rebalance: rbperf: success: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is interesting. Thanks for sharing & well done! Maybe we > > > > > > should > > > > > > attempt a much larger data set and see how we fare there :). > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vijay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________ _________________ > > > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/ mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
