Re: WARNING: patches marked as Verified might not be

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:02:39AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>  a) Run smoke and regression as separate Gerrit users, require
>     concurrence for a patch to be considered V+1.  This is what we
>     already do for NetBSD.  It's simple, and seems to work well.

This is the way to go. Additionnaly we should configure gerrit
so that it displays the passed mark for the verified column when
it had verified >= +3 (1 smoke, 1 Linux regression, 1 NetBSD regreession).
I sent a few days ago a reference to gerrit documentation expalining how 
to do that.
-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux