Re: Extra overnight regression test run results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1 Apr 2015, at 03:48, Justin Clift <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2015, at 14:18, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <snip>
>>> Also, most of the regression runs produced cores.  Here are
>>> the first two:
>>> 
>>>  http://ded.ninja/gluster/blk0/
>> 
>> There are 4 cores here, 3 pointing to the (by now hopefully) famous bug #1195415. One of the cores exhibit a different stack etc. Need more analysis to see what the issue could be here, core file: core.16937
>> 
>>>  http://ded.ninja/gluster/blk1/
>> 
>> There is a single core here, pointing to the above bug again.
> 
> Both the blk0 and blk1 VM's are still online and available,
> if that's helpful?
> 
> If not, please let me know and I'll nuke them. :)

I'm ok to nuke both those VM's, yeah?

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux