On 29 Mar 2015, at 21:31, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > We now have the patches to recover NetBSD regression. This needs to be > reviewed and merged (it would be nice if it could be before release-3.7 > branching): > > http://review.gluster.org/10030 > http://review.gluster.org/10032 > http://review.gluster.org/10033 > http://review.gluster.org/10034 > http://review.gluster.org/9831 > http://review.gluster.org/9944 > > I also have the following pending change that may deserve a look before > branching: > http://review.gluster.org/10017 > > Once all that will be merged, we will still have a few failing cases for > which I need some help (see details below): > tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t > tests/basic/ec/ > tests/basic/tier/tier.t > tests/encryption/crypt.t > tests/features/trash.t > > I will disable them so that NetBSD regression vote can be useful. But it > would be nice if people coule help fixing them. Here are the details: > > 1) tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t > 100% reliable failure, I posted an analysis of it in > <1m21hnh.yiu9vbyqrhg9M%manu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > 2) tests/basic/ec tests have rare sprious failures, Xavier Hernandez > said he will look at it when time will allow it. > > > 3) tests/basic/tier/tier.t has 100% reliable failure on nbslave70 > > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 20/32 > md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data2.txt: No such file or directory > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 23/32 > not ok 23 Got "1" instead of "0" > md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data3.txt: No such file or directory > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 24/32 > not ok 24 Got "1" instead of "0" > umount: /mnt/glusterfs/0: Device busy > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. Failed 2/32 subtests > > ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 32 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 23-24 > > > Note that tier.t needs a portability patch not yet submitted: > diff --git a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t > index 383d470..9cc754a 100755 > --- a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t > +++ b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ sleep 12 > uuidgen >> d1/data2.txt > > # Check promotion on read to slow tier > -echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > +( cd $M0 && umount $M0 ) > cat d1/data3.txt > sleep 5 > EXPECT_WITHIN $PROMOTE_TIMEOUT "0" file_on_fast_tier d1/data2.txt > > > > 4) tests/encryption/crypt.t has 100% reliable error on nbslave70. This > is annoying because that one passed before: > > [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. 19/39 > ln: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile: Protocol error > not ok 20 > mv: rename /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile to > /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-renamed: Protocol error > not ok 21 > diff: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-symlink: No such file or directory > not ok 26 > [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. Failed 3/39 subtests > > ./tests/encryption/crypt.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 39 Failed: 3) > Failed tests: 20-21, 26 > > > 5) tests/features/trash.t is completely broken. Note that > http://review.gluster.org/10033 patches trash.t for NetBSD compatibility > > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 1/65 No volumes present > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 15/65 > not ok 15 > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 18/65 > not ok 18 > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 30/65 > not ok 30 > (...) > ./tests/features/trash.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 65 Failed: 16) > Failed tests: 15, 18, 30, 33-34, 38-39, 57-65 Awesome. :) + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
