On 10 Mar 2015, at 04:39, Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As part of our development workflow we run the regression test > suite on every patch submitted (or a set of dependent patches). > The results of a regression run could be difficult to grasp, especially > when test cases[1] belonging to different test scripts[2] fail. > This has been addressed in http://review.gluster.org/9842, thanks > to Niels de Vos. > > ~kp > > [1] - test case - a shell expression using one of TEST, EXPECT, > EXPECT_WITHIN, etc shell functions. > [2] - test script - a file containing test cases. Wonder if that could be run automatically in the regression test scripting when a failure occurs? (Note - I'm not volunteering to look into it... it's just a thought out loud ;>) + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
