Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looking at a kernel trace I can now tell that the brick0 server process > indeed gets a SIGKILL, but then glusterd spawn a new process for brick0 > that answers the requests. Silly me, this is just the "gluster volume start patchy force" that causes that. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
