Re: Initial bulk regression run analysis for release-3.6 branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks KP, that's a good start for us reducing regression failures. :)

+ Justin


On 26 Feb 2015, at 03:02, Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have provided +1. The patch looks good to me.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 25 Feb 2015, at 22:55, Justin Clift <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> * 6 x tests/basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t
>>>   Failed tests:  11-13
>>> 
>>>   30% failure rate on this.
>> 
>> This one looks like it's addressed by:
>> 
>>  http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9328/
>> 
>> It's just waiting on a +1 review by Kaushl or KP (both CC'd now).
>> 
>> :)
>> 
>> + Justin
>> 
>> --
>> GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
>> 
>> An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
>> petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
>> 
>> My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
>> 
>> 

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux