Re: Spurious regression failure analysis from runs over the wkend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23 Feb 2015, at 19:32, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
>> 4 of the regression runs also created coredumps.  Uploaded the
>> archived_builds and logs here:
>> 
>>  http://mirror.salasaga.org/gluster/
>> 
>> (are those useful?)
> 
> Yes, these are useful as they contain a very similar crash in each of the cores, so we could be looking at a single problem to fix here.

Do you have a few minutes to check if this coredump (release-3.6 branch) is
also the same problem?

http://mirror.salasaga.org/gluster/release-3.6/bulkregression17/

Ran 20x regression runs on the release-3.6 branch head, and the above was
the only one to coredump.  Several spurious errors, but that's for a later
email (probably tomorrow). :)

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux