On 23 Jan 2015, at 12:43, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > We implemented two approaches, (1) and (2i) to get some > performance numbers. The setup was 4*2 distributed-replicated volume > using ram disks as bricks to avoid hard disk bottleneck. And the numbers > are attached with the mail. Awesome. :) "2i" seems like a pretty clear win. Is the code that you used for this in Gerrit, so people can look over it as well? :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
