Hi Niels, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:08:20PM +0530, Ramana Raja wrote: >> 1) How would the above suggestion impact gfapi access? > > gfapi uses the GlusterFS protocol. When access through the protocol is > denied, only clients from within the trusted storage pool can use it. > gfapi is just a client, similar to the FUSE mount. > >> 2) Would the list of trusted clients be configured via "gluster volume set"? > > There are the 'auth.allow' and 'auth.reject' volume options. I think > they would be used as an alternative to a "turn off glusterfs protocol" > feature. Does it mean that the implementation of feature would essentially boil down to an auth ruleset calculated by glusterfs? Csaba _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
