Re: Netbsd regrsssion needs review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 Jan 2015, at 13:57, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Justin Clift <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Anyone?
> 
> Welcome back :-)

Thanks. :)


> Here are the latest suprious regression tests fixes for NetBSD:
> http://review.gluster.org/9483
> http://review.gluster.org/9461
> http://review.gluster.org/9074

Cool.  Lets try and get these merged today/tomorrow... I'm not sure
who's going to be at FOSDEM and its associated events, which may or
may not affect who's around tho. ;)


> After these ones, we still have a rare failure in ec-12-4.t which
> happens around 70 runs. I think we will be able to enable NetBSD
> regression voting before fixing it.

Yeah, that one sounds rare enough to allow it through for now. :)


> Justin, we will need to tell jenkins we want to run Linux and NetBSD
> regression in parallel. Do you have an idea on how it can be configured?

Not sure yet.  My head isn't in Jenkins-mode atm, and probably won't be
until I get back from FOSDEM (leaving today, returning on 4th Feb). ;)

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux