Anyone? On 23 Jan 2015, at 13:37, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello > > Can someone please have a look at these. Most netbsd regression failures > are caused by spurious failures fixed there. > http://review.gluster.org/9461 (only fix the test script) > http://review.gluster.org/9074 (this one probably needs a discussion) > > I can add a third one fixed this morning: > http://review.gluster.org/9483 (only fixes the test script) > > And while I am there, two backports: > http://review.gluster.org/9448 > http://review.gluster.org/9484 > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 05:28:24AM +0100, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: >> NetBSD regression tests suffers a few spurious failures. I have fixes >> for the two worst offenders: >> http://review.gluster.org/9461 >> http://review.gluster.org/9074 >> >> Can someone please review? > > -- > Emmanuel Dreyfus > manu@xxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
