On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:29AM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote: > By contrast, the failure mode for the map-caching approach - a simple > failure in readdir - is relatively benign. Such failures are also > likely to be less common, even if we adopt the *unprecedented* > requirement that the cache be strictly space-limited. If we relax that > requirement, the problem goes away entirely. I'm not sure what you mean by "strictly space-limited", but please note that some sort of cache-eviction policy will be required to keep the cache from growing without bound. (NFS unfortunately allows a client to present the server any cookie it has ever seen; they live forever.) --b. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
