Re: AFR conservative merge portability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:21:24PM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> Is there *any* case, not even necessarily involving conservative merge,
> where it would be harmful to propagate the latest ctime/mtime for any
> replica of a directory?

In case of conservative merge, the problem vanish on its own anyway:
adding entries updates parent directory ctime/mtime and the reported
split brain does not exists anymore.

Here is a first attempt, please comment:
http://review.gluster.org/9291

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux