Re: Volume management proposal (4.0)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > (E) The user must specify an explicit option to see the status of
> > secondary volumes.  Without this option, secondary volumes are hidden
> > and status for their constituent bricks will be shown as though they
> > were (directly) part of the corresponding primary volume.
>
> IIUC, secondary volumes are internal representations and do not get
> exposed to the user, then why do we need to provide an explicit option
> for the status? Correct me if my understanding is wrong.

They are exposed to the user, but only in a limited way.  For example,
the user can still set options on a secondary volume, add or remove
bricks, initiate a rebalance, and so on.  What they can't do is start
or mount it separately from its primary.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux