Re: Regression testing report: Gluster v3.6.1 on CentOS 6.6

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/11/2014 05:25 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:

I have installed gluster v3.6.1 from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-6/

The /tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t testcase passed in all 3 runs and rest of the two tests quota-anon-fd-nfs.t, /tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t failed in all 3 runs.

Thanks for this mail Kiran. http://review.gluster.org/8201 will fix /tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t

CCed vijaikumar to look into the quota-anon-fd-nfs.t

Pranith

Ondisk filesystem is ext4.

Thanks for quick feedback.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:

Test Summary Report

------------------------------

./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t                  (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)

  Failed test:  16

This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it 2-3 times to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.

./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t               (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30 Failed: 2)

  Failed tests:  10, 24

What is the underlying backend filesystem?

./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t                         (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 Failed: 2)

  Failed tests:  9, 11

CC Joseph fernandez

Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr  0.98 sys + 902.74 cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)

Result: FAIL

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel