Re: GlusterD-2.0 - thread safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 20:36:46 -0800
Harshavardhana <harsha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Justin Clift <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Forwarding this, as it's possibly very relevant for the
> > GlusterD-2.0 stuff.  It looks like the threading behaviour of Go
> > is very different to other languages (somewhat practical outline
> > given below).
> >
> > (Start with the "Normally, in any mainstream language ..." bit)
> >
> > It's probably worth being aware of sooner rather than later, and
> > thinking through potential ramifications before we decide to go
> > down that route. ;)
> >
> > Regards and best wishes,
> >
> > Justin Clift
> > ------------
> >
> 
> You didn't post the reply to that thread -
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general/91532

The reply didn't exist when I forwarded the previous message. :)

+ Justin

-- 
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux