Re: warning: bogus date in %changelog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/2014 11:32 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
Does the following warning:
   warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Jun 29 2014 Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@xxxxxxxxxx>
warrant a bug report/fix as below (based on date of commit 8d8abc19)? Or should I just leave it as is?


diff --git a/glusterfs.spec.in b/glusterfs.spec.in
index f373b45..5ad4956 100644
--- a/glusterfs.spec.in
+++ b/glusterfs.spec.in
@@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ fi
  * Wed Sep 24 2014 Balamurugan Arumugam <barumuga@xxxxxxxxxx>
  - remove /sbin/ldconfig as interpreter (#1145992)
-* Thu Jun 29 2014 Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@xxxxxxxxxx>
+* Thu Jun 19 2014 Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@xxxxxxxxxx>
  - Added dynamic loading of fuse module with glusterfs-fuse package installation in el5.
* Fri Jun 27 2014 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx>


/Anders
I checked master branch and I can see the date and day is correct in glusterfs.spec.in as below. Where do you see wrong change log i.e. Thu Jun 29 2014 Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@xxxxxxxxxx>?

* Thu Jun 19 2014 Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Added dynamic loading of fuse module with glusterfs-fuse package installation in el5.

Thanks,
Lala

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux