I changed git fetch git://review.gluster.org/glusterfs to git fetch http://review.gluster.org/glusterfs and now it works.
Thanks,
Kiran.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Kiran Patil <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Niels,I am getting "fatal: Couldn't find remote ref refs/changes/13/8213/9" error.Steps to reproduce the issue.1) # git clone git://review.gluster.org/glusterfsInitialized empty Git repository in /root/gluster-3.6/glusterfs/.git/remote: Counting objects: 84921, done.remote: Compressing objects: 100% (48307/48307), done.remote: Total 84921 (delta 57264), reused 63233 (delta 36254)Receiving objects: 100% (84921/84921), 23.23 MiB | 192 KiB/s, done.Resolving deltas: 100% (57264/57264), done.2) # cd glusterfs# git branch* master3) # git fetch git://review.gluster.org/glusterfs refs/changes/13/8213/9 && git checkout FETCH_HEADfatal: Couldn't find remote ref refs/changes/13/8213/9Note: I also tried the above steps on git repo https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs and the result is same as above.Please let me know if I miss any steps.Thanks,Kiran.On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:19:13PM +0530, Kiran Patil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created replicated vol with two bricks on the same node and copied some
> data to it.
>
> Now removed the disk which has hosted one of the brick of the volume.
>
> Storage.health-check-interval is set to 30 seconds.
>
> I could see the disk is unavailable using zpool command of zfs on linux but
> the gluster volume status still displays the brick process running which
> should have been shutdown by this time.
>
> Is this a bug in 3.6 since it is mentioned as feature "
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.6/doc/features/brick-failure-detection.md"
> or am I doing any mistakes here?
The initial detection of brick failures did not work for all
filesystems. It may not work for ZFS too. A fix has been posted, but it
has not been merged into the master branch yet. When the change has been
merged, it can get backported to 3.6 and 3.5.
You may want to test with the patch applied, and add your "+1 Verified"
to the change in case it makes it functional for you:
- http://review.gluster.org/8213
Cheers,
Niels
> _______________________________________________
>
> [root@fractal-c92e gluster-3.6]# gluster volume status
> Status of volume: repvol
> Gluster process Port Online Pid
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brick 192.168.1.246:/zp1/brick1 49154 Y 17671
> Brick 192.168.1.246:/zp2/brick2 49155 Y 17682
> NFS Server on localhost 2049 Y 17696
> Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A Y 17701
>
> Task Status of Volume repvol
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> There are no active volume tasks
>
>
> [root@fractal-c92e gluster-3.6]# gluster volume info
>
> Volume Name: repvol
> Type: Replicate
> Volume ID: d4f992b1-1393-43b8-9fda-2e2b6e3b5039
> Status: Started
> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: 192.168.1.246:/zp1/brick1
> Brick2: 192.168.1.246:/zp2/brick2
> Options Reconfigured:
> storage.health-check-interval: 30
>
> [root@fractal-c92e gluster-3.6]# zpool status zp2
> pool: zp2
> state: UNAVAIL
> status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures.
> action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run 'zpool
> clear'.
> see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-HC
> scan: none requested
> config:
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> zp2 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas
> sdb UNAVAIL 0 0 0
>
> errors: 2 data errors, use '-v' for a list
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kiran.
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel