On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT)
Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am going to be bold and throw a suggestion inspired from
> what I read today. I was reading briefly about how kernel
> manages its objects using the kobject data structure and
> establishe 'liveness' (in the garbage collection sense)
> relationship across objects. It allows one to group objects
> into 'sets'. This would help us to categorise objects into
> 'groups' and derive from statedumps which group the leaking
> object belongs to and infer some context out of that. This is
> different from the other approaches that have been discussde. I am not familiar
> with what more could be done with that sort of an infrastructure. I hope
> this opens up the discussion and doesn't distract it.
Interesting thought. What's the concept with this we'd implement
for GlusterFS?
eg what are the important points you reckon we should do, and
where would be the right places to start? :)
+ Justin
>
> ~KP
--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
