Edward Shishkin <edward@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the report, > I am still not sure that symlinks are the culprit. Um, you link on a symlink? That could be the answer: Linux links on the symlink while BSD links on the target (both behavior are POSIX compliant): Here is BSD hehavior: # ls -l a b -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 15 04:19 a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1 Oct 15 04:20 b -> a # ln b c # ls -li a b c 579242 -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 0 Oct 15 04:19 a 579244 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1 Oct 15 04:20 b -> a 579242 -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 0 Oct 15 04:19 c > Could you please try the attached version of crypt.t and report results? It passes. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
