Re: Jeff Darcy's objections to multi-thread-epoll and proposal to use own-thread alternative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> This e-mail is specifically about use of multi-thread-epoll optimization
> (originally prototyped by Anand Avati) to solve a Gluster performance
> problem: single-threaded reception of protocol messages (for non-SSL
> sockets), and consequent inability to fully utilize available CPU on server.
> A discussion of its pros and cons follows, along with the alternative to it
> suggested by Jeff Darcy, referred to as "own-thread" below.  Thanks to Shyam
> Ranganathan for helping me to clarify my thoughts on this.

Reckon it would much work to get an initial implementation happening (that
passes the regression tests), so it can be measured?

If not a huge amount of work, this sounds like a very important experiment
to try out.  If successful, this could really help a lot of our users. :)

+ Justin

-- 
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux