----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi > <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think using Salt as the orchestration framework is a good idea. > > We would still need to have a consistent distributed store. I hope > > Salt has the provision to use one of our choice. It could be consul > > or something that satisfies the criteria for choosing alternate technology. > > I would wait for a couple of days for the community to chew on this and > > share their thoughts. If we have a consensus on this, we could 'port' > > the 'basic'[1] volume management commands to a system built using Salt and > > see for real how it fits our use case. Thoughts? > > > I disagree. I think puppet + puppet-gluster would be a good idea :) > One advantage is that the technology is already proven, and there's a > working POC. > Feel free to prove me wrong, or to request any features that it's missing. ;) > I am glad you joined this discussion. I was expecting you to join earlier :) IIUC, puppet-gluster uses glusterd to perform glusterfs deployments. I think it's important to consider puppet given its acceptance.What are your thoughts on building 'glusterd' using puppet? The proposal mail describes the functions glusterd performs today. With that as a reference could you elaborate on how we could use puppet to perform some (or all) the functions of glusterd? ~KP _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
