Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Krishnan Parthasarathi" <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Balamurugan Arumugam" <barumuga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:25:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users]  Proposal for GlusterD-2.0
> 
> Bala,
> 
> I think using Salt as the orchestration framework is a good idea.
> We would still need to have a consistent distributed store. I hope
> Salt has the provision to use one of our choice. It could be consul
> or something that satisfies the criteria for choosing alternate technology.
> I would wait for a couple of days for the community to chew on this and
> share their thoughts. If we have a consensus on this, we could 'port'
> the 'basic'[1] volume management commands to a system built using Salt and
> see for real how it fits our use case. Thoughts?
> 

For distributed store, I would think of MongoDB which provides distributed/replicated/highly available/master read-write/slave read-only database.  Lets get what community think about SaltStack and/or MongoDB.



> 
> [1] basic commands - peer-probe, volume-create, volume-start and
> volume-add-brick
> 

Regards,
Bala
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux