Emmanuel, Yeah, that should do. I don't think you need to go out of the way to support lazy umount functionality in *BSD, when it's not essential to the working of replace-brick and other commands that use lazy umount. ~KP ----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 02:03:28AM -0400, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote: > > IIRC, lazy umount is being used in glusterd to avoid leaving > > behind an entry in /etc/mtab, for every internal mount that > > failed to unmount for some reason. replace-brick command doesn't > > have a requirement that the umount must happen in a lazy manner. > > And since *BSD do not have a /etc/mtab, there is really no requirement. > I will resubmit a change without lazy umount emulation. > > > -- > Emmanuel Dreyfus > manu@xxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
