Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Does this mean we'll need to learn Go as well as C and Python?
>
> If so, that doesn't sound completely optimal. :/
>
> That being said, a lot of distributed/networked computing
> projects seem to be written in it these days.  Is Go specifically
> a good language for our kind of challenges, or is it more a case
> of "the new shiny"?

Go has a more vibrant community, it would be indeed a great strategic decision.
Consul is also a much thought out project.

So i am loving what Kaushal has proposed - great stuff.  One can
easily write C bindings
to Go! so it isn't a tight requirement.

Gluster management daemon should be really thin while it can really
serve simple requests
  - Also Gluster management becomes an API but abstracted
  - This API allows for making Gluster management daemon extensible in
various languages
     too - for example writing a Javascript UI which provides a
tighter coupling with Gluster management
     API.

Indeed a great step in this direction +1

-- 
Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse
regulation with outcomes
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux