All, Since I've had no objections to this idea, I'm going to update the documentation with this. Jeff, Could you explain what you meant by 'arranged into subdirectories'? I didn't understand what you meant by that. ~kaushal On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Currently we name tests associated with a bug with just the bug-id as >> 'bug-XXXXXXX.t'. This naming doesn't provide any context directly, and >> someone looking at just the name wouldn't know what it does. >> >> I suggest that we use slightly more descriptive names to the tests. >> Lets name the tests as 'bug-XXXXXXX-checking-if-feature-Y-works.t'. >> This provides just enough context to understand what the test is >> trying to do from just the name. >> >> How do you all feel about this? > > > It's an excellent idea. While we're at it, it would also be nice if > tests were arranged into subdirectories so that it's easier to find > those that might be particularly useful for testing new code. > > BTW, it should be possible to write a script that would fetch the > bug title from Bugzilla, which (properly mangled) could be a first > guess at the new test name. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
