On 2014-07-21 19:14, Jeff Darcy wrote: >>>> But this offset gap widens as and when more translators (which need >>>> to store subvol-id) get added to the gluster stack which may >>>> eventually result in the similar issue which you are facing now. > > Perhaps it's time to revisit the idea of making assumptions about d_off > values +1 :-) > and twiddling them back and forth, vs. maintaining a precise > mapping between our values and local-FS values. > > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/4675/ > > That patch is old and probably incomplete, but at the time it worked > just as well as the one that led us into the current situation. Seems a lot sounder than: However both these filesystmes (EXT4 more importantly) are "tolerant" in terms of the accuracy of the value presented back in seekdir(). i.e, a seekdir(val) actually seeks to the entry which has the "closest" true offset. Let me know if you revisit this this one. Thanks Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone: +46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
