On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 06:17:23PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: > On 2014-07-17 18:10, Kaushal M wrote: > > "Bugs"/"bug" in the documents are not really what you think they mean. > > > > We use bugzilla to track glusterfs development. It is used for track > > defects (bugs) in the software, enhancements and new features. What we > > really mean by a patch needs a bug id is that we need it to have an > > entry on bugzilla, so that it's lifecycle can be tracked correctly. So > > bug just means bugzilla entry. You have bug "bugs", enhancement > > "bugs", feature request "bugs" and so on. > > > > tl;dr: "bug" == bugzilla entry. > OK. would be nice to have a link back to the bugzilla from gerrit by the way, > cut and paste of the bug number is somewhat error-prone :-( Yes, indeed. Gerrit support this out of the box, it just needs to be configured correctly: - http://review.gluster.org/Documentation/config-gerrit.html#_a_id_commentlink_a_section_commentlink I'll send an email to the infrastructure list for this so that somebody can hopefully pick it up. Thanks, Niels > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Anders Blomdell > > <anders.blomdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2014-07-17 15:44, Kaushal M wrote: > >>> I don't understand your confusion, but maybe these docs need to be reworded. > >> Not confused, just observed that some of my patches regarding development > >> workflow does not need to show up as bugs for gluster (at least not until > >> somebody has verified that they could be useful to somebody else but me). > >> > >>> What both of these want to say is that for a patch to be merged into > >>> glusterfs, it needs to be associated with a bug-id. This association > >>> is done by adding a 'BUG: <id>' line in the commit message. If you > >>> haven't manually added a bug-id in the commit message, the rfc.sh > >>> script will prompt you to enter one and add it to the commit-message. > >>> But, it is possible ignore this prompt and submit a patch for review. > >>> A patch submitted for review in this manner will only be reviewed. It > >>> will not be merged. > >>> > >>> The simplified workflow document doesn't mention this as it was > >>> targeted at new developers, and I felt having this details was TMI for > >>> them. But now when I rethink it, it's the seasoned developers who are > >>> beginning to contribute to gluster, who are more likely to use that > >> s/seasoned developers/ignorant old fools/g :-) > >> > >>> doc. > >>> > >>> ~kaushal > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Anders Blomdell > >>> <anders.blomdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> ...and I'm sorry about that, the following documents are somewhat contradictory: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Simplified_dev_workflow > >>>> > >>>> The script will ask you to enter a bugzilla bug id. Every > >>>> change submitted to GlusterFS needs a bugzilla entry to be > >>>> accepted. If you do not already have a bug id, file a new > >>>> bug at Red Hat Bugzilla. If the patch is submitted for review, > >>>> the rfc.sh script will return the gerrit url for the review request. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Development_Work_Flow > >>>> > >>>> Prompt for a Bug Id for each commit (if it was not already provded) and > >>>> include it as a "BUG:" tag in the commit log. You can just hit <enter> at > >>>> this prompt if your submission is purely for review purposes. > > /Anders > > > -- > Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Department of Automatic Control > Lund University Phone: +46 46 222 4625 > P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 > SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- Niels de Vos Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer Support Engineering Group Red Hat Global Support Services _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel