Re: failing basic/afr/self-heal.t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It looks like if there is a mismatch between the socket names as 
> expected by glusterd and used by glustershd. How are they chosen?

Um, no, the first one is the NFS server, and the second one is
glustershd. That does not explains why gluster volume statusseems both
disabled.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux